Pym's Technology Lawyers
Pym's Technology Lawyers

Legal Protection for ISPs


Where an ICT supplier is providing hosting services it is possible for the ICT supplier to expose itself to significant liability resulting from the content that is loaded in, and transmitted through, the customer’s applications and the network.  The ICT supplier is not in control of this content, yet the ICT supplier may still be liable.  The ICT supplier may become liable in respect of the content in the following ways:

because the ICT supplier is deemed to be the “publisher” of any content that is defamatory.  The law of the defamation applies here;

because the ICT supplier is deemed to “authorise” the infringement of copyright material if the content includes items which are infringing copies of copyright e.g. pirated videos, music or other infringing materials.

This may be an infringement of copyright;

because the ICT supplier is disclosing, storing or using personal information in breach of privacy laws;

because the ICT supplier is hosting or providing access to materials which are restricted under specific laws such as the laws that deal with the distribution of pornography.

Whilst most of these exposures lead to civil liabilities of damages and/or an account of profits, some of these actions have criminal penalties. Further, liabilities extend beyond traditional Internet Service Providers (ISPs), yet any statutory protections may not apply to all types of ISP or other hosting service provider.

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has adopted the WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996, which provides that copyright liability should not apply to a person that is servicing as a “conduit”, who provides physical facilities for enabling or making a communication.  Australia has implemented this principle through the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth).  As a result, the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement subsequently required Australia to provide rules for the liability of ISPs for copyright infringement reflecting the rules in the US for limiting liability of ISPs for copyright infringement.  

The effect of this new provision in the Copyright Act is that from 1 January 2005 there will be limits to the “carriage service provider”, including ISPs who satisfy the conditions of the Act.

Generally, where a service provider satisfies the conditions in the Act it will not be liable for damages (which might include having to account for profits) for any infringement of copyright, rather the main remedy is to be subject to an order to take down the infringing material from the site and/or terminate the account.

To be able to take advantage of these “safe harbor” provisions the ISP must:

(a) have and implement a policy of terminating accounts of repeat infringers; and

(b) accommodate and not interfere with technological measures used to protect and identify copyright works.

Once these threshold issues are met, a range of further conditions need to be satisfied depending on the services that are to be provided.



SAFE HARBOUR CONDITIONS

Services provided

Conditions

Providing facilities or services for transmitting, routing or providing connections for copyright material or the intermediate transient storage of copyright material in the course of transmission, routing or provision of connections. (Category A).

·        The transmission of copyright material must not have been initiated by the ISP; e.g. must be user or another person.

·        The copyright material must have been transmitted without substantive modification.

Caching copyright material through an automatic process. (Category B).

·        If access to the original content site requires user access subject to conditions, the ISP must ensure that access to significant part of the cached material is permitted to users who have met those conditions.

·        The ISP must comply with any industry code relating to the update of cached copyright material and any industry code for the non-interference with technology used at the original content site to monitor use of or access to the copyright material.

·        ISP must expeditiously remove or disable access to cached copyright material after notification in the prescribed form that material has been removed or blocked at the original content site.

·        The cached copyright material must have been transmitted to users without substantive modification.

At the direction of a user, storing copyright material on a system or network controlled by or for the ISP. e.g. hosted web site. (Category C).

·        The ISP must not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity if it has the right and ability to control the activity.

·        The ISP must expeditiously remove or disable access to copyright material residing on its systems on receipt of a notice (in prescribed form) that material has been found by a court to be infringing.

·        The ISP must act expeditiously to remove or disable access to copyright material residing on its systems if the ISP becomes aware that material is infringing or becomes aware of facts or circumstances that make it apparent that the material is likely to be infringing.

·        The ISP must comply with the prescribed procedure for the removal or disabling access to copyright material on its systems. e.g. take-down notice or counter notice.

Referring users to an online location by using information location tools or technology, eg hyperlinks, pop-up windows, search engines and online directories. (Category D).

·        The ISP must not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity if it has the right and ability to control the activity.

·        The ISP must expeditiously remove or disable access to a reference residing on its systems on receipt of a notice (in prescribed form) that the material which the reference refers to has been found by a court to be infringing.

·        The ISP must act expeditiously to remove or disable access to a reference residing on its systems if the ISP becomes aware that the copyright material it refers to is infringing or becomes aware of facts or circumstances that make it apparent that the copyright material it refers to is likely to be infringing.

·        The ISP must comply with the prescribed procedure for the removal or disabling access to copyright material on its systems, e.g. take-down notice or counter notice.


Next, learn more about Hosting Services & Service Credits

 
 

Which contract is best for me?


Clicking on the link to one of the specific online Contract Templates listed on this page will give you a description of when that particular contract should be used, and help you decide if it is the right document for your needs.